Friday, February 10, 2012

Columbus Dispatch: Ohioans will get share of $25 billion foreclosure settlement



The story is here

Ohioans will get share of $25 billion foreclosure settlement

Fund is enough to give each Ohio homeowner in trouble only $1,000

By  Jim Weiker

The Columbus Dispatch Friday February 10, 2012 11:08 AM

Tens of thousands of struggling Ohioans stand to benefit from a landmark settlement reached yesterday with the nation’s largest lenders.

Ohio’s $335 million share of the $25 billion settlement will be used to help residents stay in their homes, demolish thousands of blighted properties and compensate some who lost their homes to foreclosure.

“Although this settlement is of historic proportion, we know it does not solve the mortgage crisis,” Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine said. “It is a start. It is a first step.”

The deal is the biggest settlement involving a single industry since a 1998 multistate tobacco deal.

Under the agreement between 49 state attorneys general and the lenders — Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial — will modify loans for almost 1 million households. They also will send checks to about 750,000 Americans who were foreclosed upon. The banks will have three years to fulfill the terms of the deal.

The five banks service about 55 percent of U.S. home loans. Federal and state officials are pursuing a similar settlement with nine other lenders, which could bring the value of the deal to more than $40 billion.

Ohio’s share of the settlement will be divided this way:

• $102 million will come in the form of loan modifications to homeowners who are delinquent or in the foreclosure process, possibly allowing them to remain in their homes.

• $90 million will allow homeowners who owe more than their home is worth — so-called “ underwater” mortgages — to refinance or reduce the loan balance.

• $44 million will compensate former homeowners who were foreclosed upon between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2011. The amount of the payment will depend on the numbers who apply, but it is expected to be between $1,500 and $2,000 per home. Exactly who will qualify for the money has yet to be determined.

• $97 million will come as a direct payment to the state, $75 million of which the attorney general’s office will use to demolish abandoned properties across the state. The money will be distributed in matching grants to communities, although details on disbursement still are being worked out.

“The time has come to shout, ‘Tear down these houses; tear down these buildings!’ ” DeWine said.

The settlement is the result of months of negotiations between the states and the lenders, after several states including Ohio threatened to sue lenders over shoddy foreclosure paperwork.

President Barack Obama and other politicians praised the settlement as an important step to fixing the nation’s housing industry, which is in a six-year slump.

The agreement, said Obama, “will speed relief to the hardest-hit homeowners, end some of the most-abusive practices of the mortgage industry and begin to turn the page on an era of recklessness that has left so much damage in its wake.”

Others were more cautious. They noted that the total value of the agreement addresses a fraction of housing’s problems and that banks already are modifying loans.

“I really don’t see this as being that big a deal,” said Richard Green, director of the University of Southern California’s Lusk Center for Real Estate. “In reality, the total number of dollars is still small compared to the value of the mortgages that are underwater. To some extent, the numbers reflect losses the lenders would have taken anyway.”

About 9 percent of Ohio’s 1.4 million home mortgages are delinquent, and more than 4 percent are in the foreclosure process, leaving almost 200,000 state homeowners in trouble. The $192 million reserved for troubled Ohio homeowners in the settlement amounts to less than $1,000 per homeowner.

“I think this will be beneficial for some, but we don’t see a lot of folks who are just $1,000 behind,” said Stephen Torsell, executive director of Homes on the Hill, which assists troubled West Side homeowners.

“Sometimes, that’s a large gap to fill, with a reduction in income or loss of a job, but any funds will be helpful,” Torsell said.

Just as important, said some, is that the agreement helps clarify mortgage rules moving forward.

The settlement addresses, for example, one of the biggest complaints from homeowners during housing’s meltdown: the difficulty in getting clear answers from the bank.

The deal requires banks to establish a single point of contact between the bank and homeowner.

The agreement also prohibits lenders from foreclosing on a homeowner who is being considered for a modification.

Banking representatives praised the settlement as an important step toward getting housing back on track.

“It’s good that the settlement is finally here, so we can move on,” said Bob Niemi, executive director of the Ohio Mortgage Bankers Association.
 

Columbus Dispatch: Council OKs directing Weinland Park property taxes to upgrades there




By  Doug Caruso
The Columbus Dispatch Monday February 6, 2012 10:29 PM

Columbus will set aside new property taxes on developments in the Weinland Park neighborhood to pay for streets and other public improvements there.

The Columbus City Council approved two tax-increment-financing districts tonight in an agreement with Wagenbrenner Development, the company that is redeveloping the former Columbus Coated Fabrics site with homes and condominiums.

In the districts, taxes on the increased value of the property will go into a special fund. That fund will reimburse Wagenbrenner for upgrades it makes to public streets, curbs, street lights and other infrastructure.

Councilman Zach M. Klein, who leads the council’s development committee, praised the Weinland Park project. “It’s been a very successful project in the community,” he said.

The city will reimburse Columbus Public Schools for the schools' share of the property taxes set aside in the districts, City Council President Andrew J. Ginther said after the meeting.

“The policy of the city of Columbus is to make the schools whole,” said Ginther, a former school-board member.

Other agencies supported by property taxes, such as Children Services and the zoo, will not be reimbursed.

Wagenbrenner has been before the council regularly recently for its developments in Weinland Park and the Harrison West neighborhood just south of Ohio State University.

Last month, the council approved zoning changes necessary for the company to build 108 apartments in Harrison West. The council also has supported the company’s requests for millions in state grants to clean up the former industrial sites.

In another matter tonight, the council approved refinancing up to $253.5 million in city debt.

“With the interest rate levels we have today, I am absolutely convinced we can save millions of dollars,” said city Auditor Hugh J. Dorrian.

dcaruso@dispatch.com

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Columbus Dispatch: Ibiza’s developers face state allegations




By  Jim Weiker
The Columbus Dispatch Wednesday February 8, 2012 6:44 AM

The Ohio Division of Securities has accused the developers of a major Short North condominium project of lying to investors and improperly distributing funds to themselves.

An attorney for the developers denied the allegations and said he plans to dispute them.

The allegations are the latest twist in the six-year saga of Ibiza, a proposed 11-story, 135-unit condominium at Hubbard and High streets.

The securities division accuses developer Apex Realty Enterprises of lying to potential investors in 2006 by stating that 120 of the 135 condominium units had been sold for a total of $68 million.

In fact, says the division, none of the units had been sold at that time.

Apex’s attorney, Timothy Miller, said the figures came from an estimate of the project’s future earnings that was distributed to potential investors and was not a statement of actual sales.

The division also alleges that Apex’s four principals each took about $80,000 in investor money without disclosing it to outside investors. The principals are Raymond Brown, Michael Council, Wilbur Ischie and Rajesh Lahoti, all of Columbus.

In addition, Council improperly received an $80,000 loan from the investment fund, according to the securities charges.

Miller said the principals were entitled to all the money they withdrew and much more that they didn’t.

“They put in more money than that — hundreds of thousands of dollars that they lost on this deal,” said Miller, a lawyer with Isaac, Brant, Ledman & Teeter of Columbus. “They were also entitled to a million-dollar development fee they never took.”

Miller said he will seek a hearing with the securities commission by the end of the week to fight the allegations. “I feel very confident that we will prevail on the claim simply because our clients haven’t done anything wrong,” he said.

The commission said it will issue a cease-and-desist order against the developers if they do not appeal or if a hearing fails to change the allegations. The order is essentially a ruling that the developers violated Ohio securities law but is not a criminal charge.

Brian Laliberte, a Columbus lawyer who represents buyers who lost deposits on Ibiza condominiums, said the state’s allegations reinforce his belief that developers mishandled money.

“The division’s findings confirm everything we believe to be true about the project,” he said.

The allegations provide a further glimpse into the financial collapse of what was to be the biggest condominium development in the Short North, a luxury complex with prices ranging from $159,999 to $1.5 million for a penthouse unit.

Starting in 2008, Apex and its sister company, ARMS Properties, collected 5 percent deposits on 75 of the units for a total of $1.16 million, an average of about $15,000 each.

The project never broke ground, however, and Apex filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in April. In a reorganization filing, Apex has proposed reimbursing condominium depositors an average of $2,600.

Other developers are eyeing the property for an apartment complex.

Business First: Sutherlands Lumber closing east Columbus store; promises to reopen in new location



  
Business First by Dan Eaton, Staff reporter 
Kansas City-based Sutherlands Lumber Co. is winding down business at its store at 575 N. Nelson Road, near Bexley. A spokeswoman would not confirm the last day of operation, but said the company plans to reopen at a new location in Central Ohio, though no location has been found yet.

Family-run Sutherlands has 57 stores in 13 states, primarily in Texas and surrounding states. Central Ohio is home to two additional stores at 2590 Clime Road in southwest Columbus and in Circleville, but otherwise the market is a geographic outlier for the chain, whose next closest store is in Hannibal, Mo.

The spokeswoman said there are no plans to close the other stores and leave Ohio.

Sunday, February 5, 2012

Forbes: COSI is 5th Best Children's Museum


 The story is here

COSI: Center of Science and Industry, Columbus, OH

This huge children’s museum is one of the nation’s largest – and one of the few that can also keep adults fully engaged. It features more than 320,000 square feet of exhibit space, including “little kidspace®”, a 10,000 square foot area for kids not yet in first grade, designed by early education experts. The main part of the museum consists of 10 permanent exhibits exploring space, the oceans, our bodies, minds and spirits, gadgets and much more, all geared towards helping children learn while having fun. One unique highlight is the daily live shows, including rat basketball - real rats playing basketball! - and the hair-raising Electrostatic Generator show.

Reuters: Obama presses Congress to step up aid for homeowners


President Obama holds up a piece of paper he demonstrated as what he would like to see used for future mortgage loans while he talks about the economy at the James Lee Community Center in Falls Church, Virginia, February 1, 2012. Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing
WASHINGTON | Wed Feb 1, 2012 6:48pm EST
 
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama on Wednesday proposed a multi-billion-dollar package to help U.S. homeowners refinance and stave off foreclosure, part of an election-year push that is likely to face an uphill battle by the Republican opposition in Congress.

Obama moved to counter Republican criticism that the proposal would use taxpayer money to bail out irresponsible borrowers by stressing that only homeowners current on their payments could benefit. The president had sketched out the plan in his State of the Union address last week.

Home values have dropped 33 percent from their 2006 peak and nearly 11 million Americans now owe more than their homes are worth. Millions more have lost their homes in states that are up for grab in November's presidential election.

The White House is seeking to contrast Obama's stance with that of Republican presidential front-runner Mitt Romney, who has said foreclosures should be allowed to run their course.

"The truth is, it will take more time than any of us would like for the housing market to recover from this crisis," Obama said at a community center in Falls Church, Virginia. "But there are actions we can take, right now, to provide some relief to folks who've been making their payments on time."

The $5 billion to $10 billion program, that would be funded by a tax on the nation's largest banks, would allow homeowners to refinance at record low borrowing costs through government-backed loans. A senior administration official said it could reach 3.5 million Americans whose loans are not government-guaranteed. An additional 11 million homeowners whose loans are backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could also be eligible, the official said.

The Federal Housing Administration would run the program -- another sticking point for Republicans, who are worried about the agency's solvency. The FHA has been hard hit by mortgage defaults, and Republican lawmakers have warned it could eventually need a taxpayer bailout.

Republicans also have rejected Obama's call to pay for the program with a bank tax that Congress has turned down twice before.

"Rather than increase the government's stranglehold on our nation's housing finance system, we need to dial it back," said Republican Representative Scott Garrett of New Jersey.

RAMPING UP HOUSING RELIEF EFFORTS

Obama's plan would allow borrowers to refinance even if they owe far more than their homes are worth. Many homeowners have not been able take advantage of current record-low mortgage rates because the value of their homes has fallen and lending standards have tightened.

The White House said the program could save borrowers an average of $3,000 a year. It would be open to homeowners who have been current on their payments for the last six months and who have not missed more than one payment in the prior six months.

Applicants would need to occupy their home and have a credit score of 580 or higher to be eligible for the program. Only loans that fall beneath the FHA lending cap, which reaches as high as $729,750 in some high-cost markets, would be eligible.

"Government certainly can't fix the entire problem on its own. But it is wrong for anyone to suggest that the only option for struggling, responsible homeowners is to sit and wait for the housing market to hit bottom," Obama said.

The administration also said it intends to ask Congress to broaden a separate refinance program that seeks to help underwater borrowers with loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac win new loan terms. It said the regulator that oversees the two government-controlled mortgage firms - the Federal Housing Finance Agency - had not done enough to make the program accessible.

Together, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHA own or guarantee nine out of 10 new U.S. home loans.

In addition, the administration called for a single set of federal standards for the mortgage servicing industry that would include simpler loan forms and greater efforts to assist borrowers facing foreclosure. An effort by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is already underway to streamline mortgage paperwork.

Obama also highlighted an effort the administration has undertaken with FHFA to convert foreclosed properties held by the two firms into rental units.

FHFA said on Wednesday that investors could now sign up to prequalify to bid on properties under the program, and said it would kick off a pilot phase soon.

Last week the administration called on FHFA to allow Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to reduce loan principal for struggling homeowners, an effort to widen the reach of its main foreclosure prevention program -- the Home Affordable Modification Program

When it launched the program in 2009, the administration said it would help as many as 4 million Americans. So far, only about 900,000 households have won permanent mortgage relief under the program.
"I'll be honest - it didn't work at the scale we'd hoped," said Obama.

(Additional reporting by Laura MacInnis and Alister Bull; Editing by Tim Ahmann; Andrea Evans; Diane Craft)

Columbus Dispatch: For buyers and sellers, a few good bets




On the House: For buyers and sellers, a few good bets 

 Jim Weiker

A colleague becomes irritated every time I write a story based on new real-estate statistics.

Perhaps he’s jealous. After all, the figures give me plenty of material for stories.

But, of course, it’s precisely the abundance of material that annoys him.

Real estate is the baseball of industries: awash in numbers that can be manipulated to demonstrate just about anything.

Want to show that home sales are up? Mention that year-over-year sales rose for five of the past six months in central Ohio.

Want to show they’re down? Note that annual home sales dropped in 2011 for the sixth straight year to the slowest year in more than a decade.

Want to show that foreclosures are up? Point out that central Ohio filings have risen for two straight months.

Want to show that they’re down? Point out that foreclosures have dropped now for two consecutive years in Ohio.

For those weary of keeping daily score, here is the big picture:

Let’s start with foreclosures. The rise in foreclosures is often linked with the housing crisis but predates it by a decade. Foreclosures started rising in Ohio in 1996 and rose steadily until 2010, when they began to taper off slightly.

As for home construction, a key measure of the housing industry, it peaked in central Ohio in 2003 before starting a precipitous five-year decline that has yet to show any signs of improvement.

If you’re a homebuilder or a worker who relies on that industry, you’re still in the dark without a flicker of light.

By two other indicators — home sales and average sale prices — the housing industry started its slide in central Ohio in early 2006 and plummeted sharply during the next three years.

But the past two years show a more complex picture: Since the end of 2009, housing sales and prices have largely leveled out; they haven’t improved but neither have they worsened significantly.

What does this mean if you’re a buyer or seller?

If you’re a buyer . . .

 

The chance that your dream home is going to drop a lot in price is slim.

Prices are still a moving target in some areas, such as certain inner-city neighborhoods that are full of foreclosures. But in most neighborhoods, prices have stabilized and aren’t likely to drop significantly.

Indeed, in some places, prices show signs of rising. The median sales prices of homes in Gahanna, Grandview Heights and Downtown Columbus were up substantially in December compared with a year earlier. (But those are one-month figures only and are based on relatively few sales.)

If you qualify for financing, are ready to buy and have found the right home, you should bite the bullet. Even if the price drops $10,000 on the home you’re eyeing, you’re gambling on three things: that someone else won’t buy the home, that interest rates will stay low and that borrowing won’t get more difficult.

The odds are in your favor on interest rates, which experts think will remain low at least through the year. But Washington is considering several changes that could make borrowing more difficult and perhaps more costly.

In addition, the number of homes for sale in central Ohio is sharply down from a year ago, meaning that there’s going to be more competition for that home you’re considering.

If you’re a seller . . .

 

Forget 2005. Your home probably isn’t worth that now. In fact, I happen to know exactly what it’s worth: No matter what you paid for it, no matter what you owe on it, no matter what it once appraised for, it’s worth precisely what someone will pay for it.

If your home has sat on the market for six months with only a handful of queries and no offers, you need to drop the price if you want to sell it.

If you can’t afford to drop the price, you had better have some cash to bring to the closing or plan to rent it, or start pleading with your bank.

So what does the future hold? Anyone who tells you they know for sure doesn’t know for sure.

But, in housing, there are many more reasons to think the worst is behind us than ahead of us.

Jim Weiker is the home and garden writer. Reach him at 614-461-5513 or by email.
jweiker@dispatch.com